- Dec 07, 2020
-
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
x86-64 psABI says that only the least significant 8 bits are significant if RAX has a return value of a function returning bool. Likewise, it looks like only the least significant 1 or 2 bytes are guaranteed to have a correct value for char and short return values, respectively.
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
_Bool isn't just a 1-bit integer because when you convert a value to bool, the result is 1 if the original value is non-zero. This is contrary to the other small integral types, e.g. char, as you can see below: char x = 256; // x is 0 _Bool y = 256; // y is 1
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-
Rui Ueyama authored
-